🔗 Share this article

I have a few thoughts about that remarks made by ESPN broadcaster a well-known announcer after Novak Djokovic's victory over the American player during the US Open last eight. Look – Fritz is the United States, Fowler is from the US – and athletic competitions frequently encourage nationalism. A little bit of letdown was understandable. Instead, Fowler brought up the ongoing drought of American men at grand slam tournaments: not one of them had lifted a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the competition.

Everyone love a storyline, me too. But come on. Even if the American had beaten the legend for the first time, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the following match, who he has never defeated in an official match. And had he someway survived that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, against whom the American had lost 10 of the last 11 sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the previous seven grand slams (and the Spaniard proceeded to defeat a tired Djokovic in the subsequent match). Fritz stated in press after the loss that he in fact liked his draw, because it presented the opportunity to beat the three best competitors in the sport back-to-back. He is more than justified to aim for the achievement; an competitor is meant to believe in themselves. But entering that Djokovic last eight match what other person in their right mind had the lack of American champions on the brain?

The American star's weaker delivery the sole barrier between her and sustained success

The American, twenty-eight, is ranked number four in the global rankings starting the upcoming ATP World Tour Finals and has secured his previous six encounters over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. It's likely he could take that spot for himself in the future. But evidently that at present, that’s as far as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard lie a vast gap of performance metrics away. His elite serve and concussive power on both front side and reverse side are more than adequate to defeat most rivals on the ATP tour. When facing the handful of generational talents, however, he is frequently helpless. The past few years has witnessed the interesting emergence of tall, gangly players who can nevertheless move around with the surprising quickness and fluidity of much shorter men. Fritz is six-foot-five and appears that way. His movement is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his limbs. So he seldom steal a point that the other player was controlling, and playing a drop shot versus him is usually a safe bet. That serves as a pretty severe restriction on his upside.

Fritz has achieved a several dramatic, unexpected improvements over the years. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was circling the lower end of the world's best thirty. 24 months after, he was approaching the elite ten. The previous season, he suddenly surged to fourth place – and held the spot. But the subsequent step, competing against and defeating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, the Italian, and including a aging Serbian, is the toughest of all. What could Fowler have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was worth commenting on the ongoing drought of US male players winning grand slams when he had departed the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just too much and the appreciation for the difficulty of the challenge insufficient.

Taylor Fritz achieved a career-best run to the All England Club last four in the summer.

The American's play in that very quarter-final ought to have been sufficient of an sign. The Serbian triumphed in four sets, a win that only felt uncertain for moments towards the conclusion, when Fritz had survived a couple championship opportunities and had a chance to hold for 5-5. The pair appeared well-balanced during the rallies, with Fritz earning plenty of chances to break. But the champion saved service break opportunity after break point, extending the run to the brink of agony. When Fritz eventually did claim one of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a terrible service game to lose his own serve again; the Serbian had drawn him into a battle secondary to the main contest and compelled him to use far too much effort to win it. Facing set points in the final game, his first serve sailed to the sky. He extended the match twice on his second serve, but ultimately committed two errors. It was not a choke, in my opinion, just a result of having to hit an excessive number of second serves.

The match was fairly compelling proof that the American is not good enough to beat any version of Djokovic, who was defeated by the Spaniard in the next round and never especially appeared like he believed he could triumph. This is absolutely fine – the Serbian is the greatest of all time, and might not be at the peak of his athletic abilities now, but has developed sufficient knowledge and tactical know-how to compensate for a significant portion of the drop-off. The problem is the individuals who were anticipating Fritz to win, and putting pressure on him to achieve that, when he was had not accomplished anything that suggested he would.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the circuit regardless. He’s a patient, reflective voice in media sessions, exceeding virtually anyone on the men's tour except for Daniil Medvedev, willing to not only say his emotions or the tactic he felt decided a match, but clarify it. That he should shoulder the majority of the responsibility for America not produce a men's grand slam winner since Andy Roddick seems unfair. (Now that the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the rankings, perhaps they can divide that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

American legend Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• The American contender
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Group

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably dwell on it forever if I fail to accomplish it,” the American told an interviewer in the summer of winning a major. It is hoped he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t achieve that goal, that breaking through the Spanish and Italian's young, terrifying empire is in fact extremely improbable for everybody else. {